CAJ Holdings, LLC v. Wright et al
Plaintiff: CAJ Holdings, LLC
Defendant: Melissa Ann Wright, Joey Wright and Wright Technology Solutions
Case Number: 3:2023cv00056
Filed: January 20, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: William L Campbell
Referring Judge: Jeffery S Frensley
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 7/31/2023. Discovery due by 8/31/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 4/30/2024. A subsequent Case Management Conference by Telephone is set for 8/2/2023 at 8:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 3/20/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
March 20, 2023 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley: Case Management Conference by Telephone held on 3/20/2023. (Hearing lasted :14)(sm)
March 10, 2023 Filing 16 PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER filed by CAJ Holdings, LLC. (Cheng, Yijie)
March 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: Due to a conflict in the Court's calendar, the Initial Case Management Conference set for March 14, 2023 at 9:30 a.m. is hereby reset for March 20, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. via telephone. All parties shall call 1-877-336-1831, and when prompted for the access code, enter 7039387# to participate in the Case Management Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 3/9/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
March 1, 2023 TN State Bar status verified as active for Stephanie Ritchie Mize admitted to this court. (ln)
February 28, 2023 Filing 14 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Wright Technology Solutions. (Mize, Stephanie)
February 28, 2023 Filing 13 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Joey Wright. (Mize, Stephanie)
February 28, 2023 Filing 12 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Melissa Ann Wright. (Mize, Stephanie)
February 28, 2023 Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Joey Wright, Melissa Ann Wright, Wright Technology Solutions.(Mize, Stephanie)
February 10, 2023 Filing 10 SUMMONS returned executed by CAJ Holdings, LLC. Wright Technology Solutions served on 1/30/2023. (O'Bryan, William)
February 10, 2023 Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed by CAJ Holdings, LLC. Melissa Ann Wright served on 1/30/2023. (O'Bryan, William)
February 10, 2023 Filing 8 SUMMONS returned executed by CAJ Holdings, LLC. Joey Wright served on 1/30/2023. (O'Bryan, William)
January 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 1/24/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
January 23, 2023 Filing 6 Summons issued as to Joey Wright, Melissa Ann Wright, Wright Technology Solutions. Service copies will be picked up by counsel at the Intake Window between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. (ln)
January 20, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 3/14/2023 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. (ln)
January 20, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (ln)
January 20, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ln)
January 20, 2023 Filing 2 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by CAJ Holdings, LLC. (ln)
January 20, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joey Wright, Melissa Ann Wright, Wright Technology Solutions (Filing fee $402, Receipt number ATNMDC-3746746) filed by CAJ Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Civil Cover Sheet)(ln)
January 20, 2023 TN State Bar status verified as active for William R. O'Bryan, Jr, Yijie L. Cheng admitted to this court. (ln)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CAJ Holdings, LLC v. Wright et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CAJ Holdings, LLC
Represented By: Yijie L. Cheng
Represented By: William R. O'Bryan, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melissa Ann Wright
Represented By: Stephanie Ritchie Mize
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joey Wright
Represented By: Stephanie Ritchie Mize
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wright Technology Solutions
Represented By: Stephanie Ritchie Mize
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?