Johnson v. Ervin Cable Construction, LLC
David Johnson |
Ervin Cable Construction, LLC |
3:2023cv00058 |
January 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
William L Campbell |
Jeffery S Frensley |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 7/31/2023. Discovery due by 1/12/2024. Motions due by 4/30/2024. Telephone Conference set for 12/13/2023 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 03/16/23. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ad) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley: Case Management Conference by Telephone held on 3/16/2023. (Hearing lasted :8)(sm) |
Filing 8 PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER filed by David Johnson. (Zenner, Matthew) |
Filing 7 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Ervin Cable Construction, LLC. (Shackelford, Erin) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Ervin Cable Construction, LLC.(Shackelford, Erin) |
Filing 5 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 01/24/23. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ad) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 3/16/2023 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. (ad) |
Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ad) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (ad) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for William S. Rutchow, Erin A. Shackelford admitted to this court. (ad) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Matthew R. Zenner admitted to this court. (ad) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Ervin Cable Construction, LLC from Chancery Court of Davidson County, Tennessee, case number 22-1625-II. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNMDC-3747009) (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit - Complaint Filed in Davidson County, Tennessee, #3 Exhibit - Signed Declaration of S. Villaverde, #4 Exhibit - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(ad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Johnson v. Ervin Cable Construction, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: David Johnson | |
Represented By: | Matthew R. Zenner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ervin Cable Construction, LLC | |
Represented By: | Erin A. Shackelford |
Represented By: | William S. Rutchow |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.