Degraphenreed v. Carter
| David of the family Degraphenreed |
| Clarence Carter |
| 3:2023cv00134 |
| February 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Barbara D Holmes |
| Aleta A Trauger |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Clarence Carter. (Barker, Amber) |
Filing 18
ORDER: The deadline for Plaintiff to file a response to the motion is April 28, 2023. A ruling on Plaintiff's pending motion for preliminary injunctive relief is reserved and will be ruled on in conjunction with the motion to dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 04/03/23. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ad)
|
| Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in Support of #16 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Clarence Carter . (Barker, Amber) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss by Clarence Carter. (Barker, Amber) |
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by David of the family Degraphenreed re #14 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order (ad) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order or Preliminary Injunction or Permanent Injunction by David of the family Degraphenreed. (kc) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by David of the family Degraphenreed re #12 Response in Opposition to Motion (ad) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Amber L. Barker admitted to this court. (ad) |
| Filing 12 Opposition to #9 MOTION for Extension of Time. filed by David of the family Degraphenreed. (ad) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Amber L. Barker on behalf of Clarence Carter (Barker, Amber) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: The motion, DE #9 , is GRANTED. The time for Defendant to respond to the complaint is extended to March 31, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 03/13/23. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ad)
|
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Jordan K. Crews admitted to this court. (ad) |
| Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Clarence Carter. (Crews, Jordan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jordan K. Crews on behalf of Clarence Carter (Crews, Jordan) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS returned executed by David of the family Degraphenreed. Clarence Carter served on 2/17/2023. (ln) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties in this case are exempt from the initial disclosures required by Rule 26(a) and the requirements of Rule 26(f). Pursuant to Local Rule 16.01(c)(1), this case is exempt from mandatory customized case management. By a separate order entered at the appropriate time, the Court will enter a scheduling order setting out deadlines for the progression of this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 03/06/23. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ad)
|
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. #4 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge. Mail sent to David of the family Degraphenreed (ad) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to oversee service of process, enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 and the Local Rules of Court. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 02/22/23. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ad)
|
| Filing 3 Summons issued as to Clarence Carter. Summons handed back to plaintiff at intake counter.(ad) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ad) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Clarence Carter (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 34675068496), filed by David of the family Degraphenreed. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment - To Complaint, #3 Attachment - Receipt)(ad) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (ad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Degraphenreed v. Carter | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David of the family Degraphenreed | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Clarence Carter | |
| Represented By: | Amber L. Barker |
| Represented By: | Jordan K. Crews |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
