Ross v. Rutherford County Detention Center et al
Bamula Ross and Bambula Ross |
Rutherford County Detention Center and Rudd Medical Center |
3:2023cv00398 |
April 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Eli J Richardson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Bambula Ross. (mg) |
Filing 4 ORDER: While Plaintiff has filed an inmate trust account statement (Doc. No. #2 at 3), the statement is not certified and does not appear to cover all of the required six-month period. To proceed as a pauper, Plaintiff MUST submit the required certified statement within 30 days of entry of this Order. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 04/25/23. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ad) |
Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ad) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Bamula Ross. (ad) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rudd Medical Center, Rutherford County Detention Center, filed by Bamula Ross.(ad) |
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (ad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.