Santiago v. Davidson County Sheriff's et al
| Davidson County Sheriff's and DDC |
| Edwin Santiago, Jr. |
| 3:2023cv00400 |
| April 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Because Petitioner has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, his Section 2241 petition is DISMISSED without prejudice to his ability to refile upon exhaustion. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 5/15/2023. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (kc) |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Edwin Santiago, Jr. (kc) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 34675069114.), filed by Edwin Santiago, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - B, #2 Attachment - Power of Attorney, #3 Attachment - Receipt)(kc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
