Smith v. Shin
Plaintiff: Brandon Smith
Defendant: Seoung E. Shin
Case Number: 3:2023cv00463
Filed: May 9, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Waverly D Crenshaw
Referring Judge: Jeffery S Frensley
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2023 Filing 9 Summons issued as to Seoung E. Shin. Service copies returned to counsel by mail. (hb)
May 17, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of Summons to be Issued as to SEOUNG E. SHIN. (Hutto, Rebecca)
May 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 is GRANTED. This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 5/16/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
May 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER:The parties shall proceed to mediation before case management proceeds. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows: 1. No later than July 10, 2023, the parties SHALL: (1) obtain a mediator, and (2) file a joint notice with the Court identifying the mediator and the mediation date; 2. Mediation SHALL take place within 90 days from the date of this Order; 3. In accordance with Local Rule 16.05(b), within two (2) business days following the mediation, the mediator shall file a report on a form available on the Court's website indicating: (1) The date on which the mediation occurred; (2) Whether all required parties were present; (3) Whether the case settled at the conclusion of the mediation; (4) Whether the mediation was continued with the consent of the parties; (5) Whether the mediation was terminated without a settlement. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 5/10/2023. (hb) (Main Document 6 replaced on 5/10/2023) (hb).
May 9, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 7/11/2023 at 9:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. (ln)
May 9, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ln)
May 9, 2023 Filing 3 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Brandon Smith. (ln)
May 9, 2023 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Brandon Smith. (ln)
May 9, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Seoung E. Shin filed by Brandon Smith. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Civil Cover Sheet)(ln)
May 9, 2023 TN State Bar status verified as active for Rebecca J. Hutto admitted to this court. (ln)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Shin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandon Smith
Represented By: Rebecca J. Hutto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Seoung E. Shin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?