Howard v. Doe et al
| Darrell Howard |
| John Doe, Alias Haagenson, (f/n/u) Norman, Brandon Watwood and Core-Civic, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv00486 |
| May 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Jeffery S Frensley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Summons issued as to Alias Haagenson. (Summons placed in USM box at intake.) (af) |
| Filing 10 LIMITED REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY by Darrell Howard. (af) Modified on 6/22/2023 (af). |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File by Darrell Howard. (af) Modified on 6/22/2023 (af). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing by Darrell Howard. (af) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff Darrell Howard's application to proceed as a pauper (Doc. No. #2 ) is GRANTED and he is ASSESSED the $350.00 filing fee. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to the Turney Center Industrial Complex. Upon initial review, the Court concludes that Plaintiff has stated the following individual capacity Eighth Amendment claims: a claim against CO John Doe for failure to protect and/or excessive force based on the occurrence of the alleged assault on February 11, 2023; and a claim against CO John Doe and CO Alias Haagenson for failing to intervene during the alleged assault. All other claims and Defendants are DISMISSED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff two service packets and the Court's Information Sheet for pro se prisoners titled "Service of Process in Civil Rights Cases." Plaintiff MUST complete a service packet for each Defendant and return it to the Clerk's Office within 30 DAYS of the date this Order is entered on the docket. Upon return of a completed service packet, PROCESS SHALL ISSUE. This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to oversee service of process, enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Court. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 5/31/2023. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail along with two service packets and "Service of Process in Civil Rights Cases" Information Sheet. Copy of Order mailed to Turney Center Industrial Complex.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
|
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 5/31/2023. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln) |
| Filing 5 Letter with Certificate (Prisoner Account) from Darrell Corey Howard. (ln) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ad) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Darrell Howard. (ad) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Darrell Howard. (ad) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Core-Civic, Inc., John Doe, Alias Haagenson, (f/n/u) Norman, Brandon Watwood, filed by Darrell Howard. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Cover Letter)(ad) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (ad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
