York v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Amanda Leshay York |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA-Email Notification |
| 3:2023cv00487 |
| May 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Jeffery S Frensley |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| IL State Bar status verified as active for Rachel Julis admitted to this court. (af) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel Julis on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Julis, Rachel) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to United States Attorney General on 6/16/2023 by Amanda Leshay York. (af) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner of Social Security on 6/13/2023 by Amanda Leshay York. (af) |
Filing 6
ORDER: The Commissioner is ORDERED to file a copy of the certified administrative record and an answer no later than 60 days after issuance of the Notice of Electronic Filing. Soc. Sec. R. 4(a). The certified administrative record may serve as the answer. Soc. Sec. R. 4(b). If the Commissioner files a motion under Rule 12, that motion must be filed no later than 60 days after issuance of the Notice of Electronic Filing. Soc. Sec. R. 4(c). The plaintiff is ORDERED to file a motion for judgment on the administrative record and an accompanying memorandum in support of the motion no later than thirty days after the certified administrative record and/or answer are filed. Soc. Sec. R. 6. The Commissioner shall file a responsive brief no later than thirty days after service of the plaintiff's motion. Soc. Sec. R. 7. The plaintiff shall file any optional reply brief no later than fourteen days after service of the Commissioner's response brief. Soc. Sec. R. 8. The reply brief shall not exceed five pages absent permission from the Court. In citing the administrative record, the parties shall use the Bates-stamped numbers in large black print generally located on the bottom right corner of each page and not the PageID numbers included by the Court's CM/ECF filing system. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 5/30/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Service copies forwarded to USM to effect service. (af) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis. Docket No. #2 . The application is approved, and the Clerk is permitted to file the case and send the summonses and complaint to the Defendant, the U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee and to the Attorney General of the United States. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 5/30/2023. (af)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF THE PARTIES TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGEIN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES ARISING UNDER 42 U.S.C. 405(g) (mg) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for April Adams Carr admitted to this court. (mg) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Amanda Leshay York. (mg) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Amanda Leshay York. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Appeal Council Action, #2 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
