Smith et al v. Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
| Courtney Smith |
| Montgomery County, Tennessee, Montgomery County, Tennessee Sheriff's Department, Sheriff John Fuson, Deputy John Doe 1 and Deputy John Doe 2 |
| 3:2023cv00509 |
| May 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Barbara D Holmes |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: Pending before the Court is Defendants' Rule 12 Motion to Dismiss Defendants Montgomery County, Tennessee Sheriff's Department and Sheriff John Fuson (Doc. No. #6 ), which was filed on June 8, 2023. Plaintiffs have not filed a response to the pending motion. Under Local Rule 7.01(a)(3), a motion is deemed unopposed if a timely response is not filed. Accordingly, Defendants' motion (Doc. No. #6 ) is GRANTED, and Defendant Montgomery County, Tennessee Sheriff's Department and Defendant Sheriff John Fuson are DISMISSED from this action. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 7/10/2023. (mg)
|
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support of #6 MOTION to Dismiss Montgomery County, Tennessee Sheriff's Department and Sheriff John Fuson filed by John Fuson, Montgomery County, Tennessee, Montgomery County, Tennessee Sheriff's Department . (Harvey, William) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Montgomery County, Tennessee Sheriff's Department and Sheriff John Fuson by John Fuson, Montgomery County, Tennessee, Montgomery County, Tennessee Sheriff's Department. (Harvey, William) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Fuson, Montgomery County, Tennessee, Montgomery County, Tennessee Sheriff's Department.(Harvey, William) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 5/31/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 8/17/2023 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (mg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for William Timothy Harvey, Rebecca J. Garman admitted to this court. (mg) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Christopher Lewis and Louis P. Chiozza, Jr not admitted to this court - Local counsel required. (mg) |
| NOTICE TO COUNSEL Christopher Lewis, Louis P. Chiozza, Jr: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall be admitted to practice. The application for admission is available on the website at #http://www.tnmd.uscourts.gov/forms/admission-practice-application (LR 83.01(a)). Admission due by 6/13/2023. (mg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Fuson, Montgomery County, Tennessee, Montgomery County, Tennessee Sheriff's Department from Montgomery County Circuit Court, case number CC-23-CV-824. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNMDC-3828779) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - State Court Complaint and Summonses, #2 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
