Starnes v. United Collection Bureau, Inc.
| Kizzy Starnes |
| United Collection Bureau, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv00521 |
| May 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Jeffery S Frensley |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE: The Court has been advised that this case has settled. Accordingly, this case is administratively closed. On or before July 21, 2023, the parties shall submit a proposed agreed order of compromise and dismissal or stipulation of dismissal. Absent the aforementioned filing or other filing from a party, this case will be dismissed with prejudice on July 21, 2023. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 6/30/2023. (kc)
|
| Filing 6 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint by United Collection Bureau, Inc..(Webb, Pamela) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 5/26/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 8/10/2023 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. (af) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (af) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (af) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Pamela Bagley Webb admitted to this court. (af) |
| NOTICE TO COUNSEL Tim O. Henshaw: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, a Certificate of Good Standing signed by the Clerk of a United States District Court or a U. S. appellate court where admitted, and pay a fee of $150.00 (LR 83.01(b)). PHV due by 6/13/2023. (af) |
| GA State Bar status verified as active for Tim O. Henshaw not admitted to this court - Local counsel required. (af) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by United Collection Bureau, Inc. from Circuit Court for Williamson County, case number 23cv-113. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNMDC-3830376) (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment - State Court Pleadings)(af) (Main Document 1 replaced on 5/23/2023) (af). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Starnes v. United Collection Bureau, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kizzy Starnes | |
| Represented By: | Tim O. Henshaw |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United Collection Bureau, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Pamela Bagley Webb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
