Lewis et al v. Viveiros et al
| Lamont Montez Lewis and Quannica Cheatham |
| Cyrah Viveiros and Landstar Ranger, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv00560 |
| May 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Alistair Newbern |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The parties have jointly filed a proposed agreed order stating that this action should be dismissed with prejudice. #13 . Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 7/26/2023. (kc)
|
| Filing 13 PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL Agreed Order of Dismissal filed by Landstar Ranger, Inc., Cyrah Viveiros. (White, Mary Beth) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: On June 23, 2023, the parties were directed to file a stipulation of dismissal by July 24, 2023. #11 . Nothing has been filed. The parties are ORDERED to file a notice of status of the settlement and dismissal or the stipulation of dismissal by August 1, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 7/25/2023. (kc)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER: The parties have notified the Court that they have reached a resolution of all claims in this matter #10 . Accordingly, the initial case management conference set on August 1, 2023, is CANCELLED. The parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal by July 24, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 6/23/2023. (kc)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement Resolution by Landstar Ranger, Inc. (White, Mary Beth) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: The motion #7 for extension of time to respond to complaint is GRANTED. Extension to and including 7/7/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 6/6/2023. (ln)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing by Landstar Ranger, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, Filing Description of Exhibits (White, Mary Beth) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint by Landstar Ranger, Inc. (Ogletree, William) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 6/2/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
| Filing 5 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Landstar Ranger, Inc.. (Peterson, Lynn) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone is set for 8/1/2023 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (kc) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (kc) |
| NOTICE TO FILER re DE#1 : Counsel failed to include the mandatory description of the attached exhibits. Counsel is directed to file a notice that lists each exhibit with a brief description. (kc) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Stanley A. Davis, Mary Beth White, William Dawson Ogletree admitted to this court. (kc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Landstar Ranger, Inc. from Davidson County Circuit Court, case number 23C837. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNMDC-3837162) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(kc) Modified on 6/1/2023 (kc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
