Sims v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.
| Lovie Nicole Sims |
| Santander Consumer USA Inc. |
| 3:2023cv00700 |
| July 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Jeffery S Frensley |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Truth in Lending |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: By August 30, 2023, the Plaintiff shall respond to the Defendant's motion. The Plaintiff is forewarned that failure to respond to the motion may result in the motion being granted or other relief being recommended. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 8/9/2023. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Because removal appears proper, this action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to oversee service of process, enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Court. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 8/8/2023. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Santander Consumer USA Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of James Cooper, #2 Exhibit B - AAA Rule 14)(Springfield, Robert) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg) |
| Filing 2 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Santander Consumer USA Inc. (mg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Santander Consumer USA Inc. from Chancery Court of Wilson County, Tennessee, case number 2023CV142. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNMDC-3865861) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court file, #2 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(mg) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (mg) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Robert F. Springfield, Katherine R. Rogers admitted to this court. (mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sims v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lovie Nicole Sims | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Santander Consumer USA Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Robert F. Springfield |
| Represented By: | Katherine R. Rogers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
