Doe #1 (SLA) et al v. Lee et al
| Jane Doe #1 (SLA), Jane Doe #2 (ALW) and John Doe #1 (FB) |
| William B. Lee and David B. Rausch |
| 3:2023cv00786 |
| July 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Alistair Newbern |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER: Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. #10 ) is GRANTED. Because the motion is unopposed, the Court makes no findings at this time as to Plaintiffs' likelihood of success on the merits of the claims. The motion to administratively stay the case pending the Sixth Circuit's decision in Does #1-9 v. Lee (Doc. No. #11 ) is also GRANTED. This case is STAYED and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pending further order of the Court. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 8/25/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #1 Complaint. Response due 9/19/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 8/24/2023. (af)
|
| Filing 11 Joint MOTION to Stay Administratively Pending Ruling in Sixth Circuit Appeal by William B. Lee, David B. Rausch. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Motion to Stay)(Jones, Miranda) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Jane Doe #1 (SLA). (Attachments: #1 Attachment memo in support of motion for unopposed PI, #2 Attachment proposed order)(Nisbet, John) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by William B. Lee, David B. Rausch. (Jones, Miranda) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Miranda H. Jones, David Lester Wickenheiser admitted to this court. (af) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by David Lester Wickenheiser on behalf of William B. Lee, David B. Rausch (Wickenheiser, David) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Miranda H. Jones on behalf of William B. Lee, David B. Rausch (Jones, Miranda) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 8/7/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION protective order by Jane Doe #1 (SLA). (Attachments: #1 Attachment memo in support of protective order, #2 Attachment proposed protective order)(Nisbet, John) |
| Filing 4 Summons issued as to William B. Lee, David B. Rausch. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (ad) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 10/11/2023 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (ad) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ad) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for John B. Nisbet, III admitted to this court. (ad) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against William B. Lee, David B. Rausch (Filing fee $402, Receipt number ATNMDC-3877614), filed by Jane Doe #1 (SLA), Jane Doe #2 (ALW), John Doe #1 (FB). (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit -1 Redacted SOR entry for SLA, #3 Exhibit - 2 Redacted Shelby County judgment for SLA, #4 Exhibit - 3 Redacted SOR entry for ALW, #5 Exhibit - 4 Redacted SOR entry for FB)(ad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
