Nicholson et al v. Singh et al
Plaintiff: Barry Nicholson and Anita Nicholson
Defendant: Gurjant Singh and Shagan Transport, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2023cv00856
Filed: August 16, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: William L Campbell
Referring Judge: Barbara D Holmes
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2023 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Shagan Transport, Inc.(White, Mary Beth) Modified on 8/24/2023 (af).
August 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 8/17/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
August 16, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 10/19/2023 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (ad)
August 16, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ad)
August 16, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (ad)
August 16, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Shagan Transport, Inc. from Circuit Court in Dickson County, Tennessee, case number 22CC-2023-CV-36. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNMDC-3888648) (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit B-Notices to Plaintiffs Atty and State Court Clerk)(ad)
August 16, 2023 NOTICE TO FILER re DE#1 : This document has been scanned. Documents generated from a word processor (Word or WordPerfect) should NOT be scanned, but rather printed directly to PDF via a PDF writer. Document must be text searchable. You do not have to refile this document, however, future scanned pleadings of this nature may require refiling. (ad)
August 16, 2023 TN State Bar status verified as active for Gayla C. Hendrix, Mary Beth White admitted to this court. (ad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nicholson et al v. Singh et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barry Nicholson
Represented By: Gayla C. Hendrix
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anita Nicholson
Represented By: Gayla C. Hendrix
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gurjant Singh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shagan Transport, Inc.
Represented By: Mary Beth White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?