Norman et al v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
Tony Norman, T. Holland and (f/n/u) Baskerville |
Davidson County Sheriff's Office, K. Piece and A. Crowmer |
3:2023cv00861 |
August 16, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Eli J Richardson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER: The Court regards Norman as the sole Plaintiff in this action, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate Baskerville and T. Holland as plaintiffs on the case docket. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff a blank IFP application (Form AO 240) and a blank Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights (Prisoner) (Pro Se Form 14). Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 10/2/2023. (xc: Order, blank forms AO 240 and Pro Se Form 14 forwarded to Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc) |
Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg) |
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (mg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against A. Crowmer, Davidson County Sheriff's Office, K. Piece, filed by Tony Norman.(mg) Modified on 8/17/2023 (mg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.