Newell v. Landmark Recovery of Louisville, LLC
Plaintiff: Meghan Newell
Defendant: Landmark Recovery of Louisville, LLC
Case Number: 3:2023cv00974
Filed: September 12, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Barbara D Holmes
Referring Judge: Eli J Richardson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2023 Filing 16 CERTIFICATE Corrected Certificate of Service filed by Landmark Recovery of Louisville, LLC re Annotation - Deficiency Notice, #15 Answer to Complaint filed by Landmark Recovery of Louisville, LLC. (Rusie, Jennifer)
November 1, 2023 NOTICE TO FILER re DE#15 : Pursuant to Local Rule 5.01, Certificates of Service shall identify by name the person served, what was served, the method of service, and date of service. Counsel did not include all Counsel on the certificate of service. Please FILE a conformed Certificate of Service for this document. (ad)
October 31, 2023 Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Landmark Recovery of Louisville, LLC.(Rusie, Jennifer)
October 27, 2023 Filing 14 PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER filed by Meghan Newell. (Berger, Lauren)
October 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: Pending is Defendant's motion for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's complaint (Docket No. #12 ), which is represented to be unopposed and is therefore GRANTED. The time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to October 31, 2023. However, because this extension falls on the same date as the initial case management conference (see Docket No. #7 ), the initial case management conference, which is currently scheduled for October 31, is RESCHEDULED for November 14, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. (CT), using the Court's conference line at 1-877-402-9753, access code 3808663#. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 10/26/23. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ad)
October 26, 2023 Reset Hearing: Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 11/14/2023 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (ad)
October 24, 2023 Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Landmark Recovery of Louisville, LLC. (Rusie, Jennifer)
October 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 : Having satisfied the requirements of Local Rule 83.01(b), the Motion for Lauren E. Berger to Appear Pro Hac Vice is granted. Signed by Lynda M. Hill, Clerk of Court, on 10/11/2023. (lh)
October 3, 2023 IN State Bar status verified as active for Lauren E. Berger not admitted to this court - Local counsel secured. (ad)
October 2, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION for attorney Lauren E. Berger to Appear Pro Hac Vice (paid $150 PHV fee; receipt number ATNMDC-3924140) by Meghan Newell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit of Lauren Berger, #2 Exhibit Cert of Good Standing)(Biesecker, Kyle)
September 19, 2023 Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed by Meghan Newell. Landmark Recovery of Louisville, LLC served on 9/14/2023. (Biesecker, Kyle)
September 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 9/13/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
September 12, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 10/31/2023 at 03:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (ad)
September 12, 2023 Filing 6 Summons issued as to Landmark Recovery of Louisville, LLC. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (ad)
September 12, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (ad)
September 12, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ad)
September 12, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (ad)
September 12, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kyle Frederick Biesecker on behalf of Meghan Newell (ad)
September 12, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Landmark Recovery of Louisville, LLC (Filing fee $402, Receipt number ATNMDC-3909432), filed by Meghan Newell. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(ad)
September 12, 2023 TN State Bar status verified as active for Kyle Frederick Biesecker admitted to this court. (ad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Newell v. Landmark Recovery of Louisville, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Meghan Newell
Represented By: Kyle Frederick Biesecker
Represented By: Lauren E. Berger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Landmark Recovery of Louisville, LLC
Represented By: Jennifer S. Rusie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?