Logo Brands v. Twenty-Six Designs, LLC
| Logo Brands, Inc. |
| Twenty-Six Designs, LLC |
| 3:2023cv01001 |
| September 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Barbara D Holmes |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
ORDER granting #15 and #16 : Having satisfied the requirements of Local Rule 83.01(b), the Motions for Kieran G. Doyle and Jeremy A. Berman to Appear Pro Hac Vice are granted. Signed by Lynda M. Hill, Clerk of Court, on 11/14/2023. (lh)
|
| Filing 22 PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER filed by Logo Brands, Inc.. (Douglass, Scott) |
| Filing 21 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, , First COUNTERCLAIM against Logo Brands, Inc. by Twenty-Six Designs, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Trademark Registration No. 7,209,812, #2 Exhibit B - U.S. Trademark Registration No. 7,209,811, #3 Exhibit C - U.S. Design Patent No. D728,938)(Cox, Matthew) |
|
Filing 20
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 11/7/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #18 motion for protective order. The parties' stipulated protective order, as modified by the Court, is entered separately. SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 11/06/2023. (BH)
|
| Filing 18 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Logo Brands, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order)(Douglass, Scott) |
| NY State Bar status verified as active for Kieran Doyle, Jeremy Berman not admitted to this court - Local counsel secured. (kc) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Matthew C. Cox admitted to this court. (kc) |
| Filing 17 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Twenty-Six Designs, LLC. (Cox, Matthew) |
| Filing 16 MOTION for attorney Jeremy A. Berman to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Paid $150 PHV fee; receipt number ATNMDC-3936114) by Twenty-Six Designs, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Certificate of Good Standing of Jeremy Berman)(Cox, Matthew) Modified on 10/31/2023 (kc). |
| Filing 15 MOTION for attorney Kieran G. Doyle to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Paid $150 PHV fee; receipt number ATNMDC-3936091) by Twenty-Six Designs, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Certificate of Good Standing of Kieran Doyle)(Cox, Matthew) Modified on 10/31/2023 (kc). |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew C. Cox on behalf of Twenty-Six Designs, LLC (Cox, Matthew) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER: Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for extension of time for Defendant to respond to the complaint #12 is GRANTED IN PART. The time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to November 10, 2023. Further, the initial case management conference, which is presently set for November 8, 2023, is RESCHEDULED to November 16, 2023 at 3:00 p.m. using the Court's conference line at 1-877-402-9753, access code 3808663#. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 10/5/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
| Set Deadlines/Hearings per Order #13 : Twenty-Six Designs, LLC answer due 11/10/2023. Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone is reset for 11/16/2023 at 03:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (kc) |
| Filing 12 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Logo Brands, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment [Proposed] Order Granting Joint Unopposed Motion for Additional Time to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint)(Douglass, Scott) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS returned executed by Logo Brands, Inc.. Twenty-Six Designs, LLC served on 9/21/2023. (Douglass, Scott) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Logo Brands, Inc. Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Trademark (Douglass, Scott) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Logo Brands, Inc. Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent (Douglass, Scott) |
| Filing 8 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Logo Brands, Inc.. (Douglass, Scott) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 9/22/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
| Filing 6 Summons issued as to Twenty-Six Designs, LLC. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (ad) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 11/8/2023 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (ad) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ad) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (ad) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (ad) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Edward D. Lanquist, Jr, Dominic A. Rota, Scott McLean Douglass admitted to this court. (ad) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Twenty-Six Designs, LLC (Filing fee $402, Receipt number ATNMDC-3917059), filed by Logo Brands, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1-Letter, #3 Exhibit 2-Draft Complaint, #4 Exhibit 3-'938 Patent, #5 Exhibit 4-'816 Patent)(ad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
