Duke v. Infinity Hospitality
Jaclyn Duke |
Infinity Hospitality |
3:2023cv01082 |
October 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Barbara D Holmes |
Eli J Richardson |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 1/19/2024. Discovery due by 8/2/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 10/25/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 11/27/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes: Case Management Conference by Telephone held on 11/21/2023.(Hearing lasted 0:27)(mcc) |
Filing 11 PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER filed by Jaclyn Duke. (Irwin, Lauren) |
Filing 10 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Infinity Hospitality. (Lyle, Paige) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Infinity Hospitality.(Lyle, Paige) |
Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Return to Sender. Not Deliverable as Addressed. Unable to Forward re #6 Summons Issued. Mail sent to Lauren J. Irwin. Remailed to Ms. Irwin. (kc) |
Filing 7 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 10/20/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Brandon G. Hall, Lauren J. Irwin admitted to this court. (ad) |
Filing 6 Summons issued as to Infinity Hospitality. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (ad) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 11/21/2023 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (ad) |
Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ad) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (ad) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (ad) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Infinity Hospitality (Filing fee $402, Receipt number ATNMDC-3933773), filed by Jaclyn Duke. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A- Right to Sue)(ad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Duke v. Infinity Hospitality | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jaclyn Duke | |
Represented By: | Brandon G. Hall |
Represented By: | Lauren J. Irwin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Infinity Hospitality | |
Represented By: | Paige M. Lyle |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.