Emmert v. Yates Services LLC
Plaintiff: Sherri Emmert
Defendant: Yates Services LLC
Case Number: 3:2023cv01197
Filed: November 14, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Jeffery S Frensley
Referring Judge: Eli J Richardson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2023 Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Yates Services LLC.(Lonergan, Matthew)
December 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint Yates Services LLC answer due 12/27/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 12/14/2023. (af)
December 14, 2023 TN State Bar status verified as active for Charles J. Mataya, Matthew C. Lonergan admitted to this court. (af)
December 13, 2023 Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Yates Services LLC. (Mataya, Charles)
December 13, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew C. Lonergan on behalf of All Defendants (Lonergan, Matthew)
December 13, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles J. Mataya on behalf of Yates Services LLC (Mataya, Charles)
November 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 11/15/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
November 14, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 2/29/2024 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. (af)
November 14, 2023 Filing 5 Summons issued as to Yates Services LLC. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (af)
November 14, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (af)
November 14, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (af)
November 14, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (af)
November 14, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Yates Services LLC (Filing fee $402, Receipt number ATNMDC-3953533), filed by Sherri Emmert. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Right to Sue, #2 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(af)
November 14, 2023 TN State Bar status verified as active for Brandon G. Hall, Lauren J. Irwin, Emily Costanzo admitted to this court. (af)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Emmert v. Yates Services LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherri Emmert
Represented By: Brandon G. Hall
Represented By: Emily Costanzo
Represented By: Lauren J. Irwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yates Services LLC
Represented By: Charles J. Mataya
Represented By: Matthew C. Lonergan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?