Hunter, Sr. v. Voltyx LLC & Arcline Investments Management et al
Plaintiff: Richard L. Hunter, Sr.
Defendant: Voltyx LLC & Arcline Investments Management and EPS-NASS Parent, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2023cv01257
Filed: November 29, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Barbara D Holmes
Referring Judge: Eli J Richardson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: As Plaintiff was already advised, he is responsible for serving process upon Defendants in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to timely complete service of process will result in dismissal of the action. So ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 1/5/2024. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
January 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Court. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 1/3/2024. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
December 11, 2023 Filing 4 SUMMONS returned executed by Richard L. Hunter, Sr. Voltyx LLC & Arcline Investments Management served on 12/6/2023. (af)
November 30, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg)
November 30, 2023 Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (mg)
November 29, 2023 Filing 2 Summons issued as to Voltyx LLC & Arcline Investments Management. Service copies returned to Plaintiff at Intake. (mg)
November 29, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EPS-NASS Parent, Inc., Voltyx LLC & Arcline Investments Management (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 300001525), filed by Richard L. Hunter, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Receipt)(mg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hunter, Sr. v. Voltyx LLC & Arcline Investments Management et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard L. Hunter, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Voltyx LLC & Arcline Investments Management
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EPS-NASS Parent, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?