Eanes v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Michael Eanes |
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC |
3:2023cv01312 |
December 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Barbara D Holmes |
Eli J Richardson |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 : Having satisfied the requirements of Local Rule 83.01(b), the Motion for M. Stan Herring, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice is granted. Signed by Lynda M. Hill, Clerk of Court, on 02/05/2025. (lh) |
AL State Bar status verified as active for M. Stan Herring, Jr not admitted to this court - Local counsel secured. (kc) |
Filing 9 First MOTION for attorney M. Stan Herring, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice (paid $150 PHV fee; receipt number ATNMDC-3996145) by Michael Eanes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Dixon, T.) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC.(Tucker, Joseph) |
Filing 7 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 12/14/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 3/11/2024 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (mg) |
Filing 5 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (mg) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (mg) |
Filing 2 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC. (mg) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC from Circuit Court of Davidson County, Tennessee, case number 23C2641. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATNMDC-3972558) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(mg) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for T. Blaine Dixon, J. Tanner Watkins admitted to this court. (mg) |
KY State Bar status verified as active for Joseph N. Tucker admitted to this court. (mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Eanes v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Eanes | |
Represented By: | T. Blaine Dixon |
Represented By: | M. Stan Herring, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC | |
Represented By: | J. Tanner Watkins |
Represented By: | Joseph N. Tucker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.