Doe #016 v. Lee et al
| John Doe #016 |
| William Lee and David Rausch |
| 3:2023cv01319 |
| December 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Alistair Newbern |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER: The Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. #10 ) is GRANTED as unopposed and well-taken. Because the motion is unopposed, the Court makes no findings (and notes that Defendants have waived no arguments) at this time as to Plaintiff's likelihood of success on the merits of his claims. The Motion to Stay (Doc. No. #12 ) likewise is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 1/22/2024. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
| TN State Bar status verified as active for David Lester Wickenheiser admitted to this court. (mg) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to #1 Complaint. Extended until 14 days after the Court rules on the pending motion to stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 1/18/2024. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
| Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Complaint by William Lee, David Rausch. (Wickenheiser, David) |
| Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Stay Administratively Pending Ruling in Sixth Circuit Appeal by William Lee, David Rausch. (Wickenheiser, David) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support of #10 Unopposed MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by John Doe #016 . (Burch, Eric) |
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by John Doe #016. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proposed Preliminary Injunction Order)(Burch, Eric) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by David Lester Wickenheiser on behalf of William Lee, David Rausch (Wickenheiser, David) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS returned executed by John Doe #016. David Rausch served on 12/27/2023. (Burch, Eric) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS returned executed by John Doe #016. William Lee served on 12/27/2023. (Burch, Eric) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the District Court in accordance with the procedures of Local Rule 16.01. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 12/18/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 3/5/2024 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (af) |
| Filing 4 Summons issued as to William Lee, David Rausch. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (af) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (af) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (af) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Eric J. Burch admitted to this court. (af) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against William Lee, David Rausch (Filing fee $405, Receipt number ATNMDC-3973482), filed by John Doe #016. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(af) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
