Elliott v. TrueAccord Corp. et al
| Samuel McKeen Elliott |
| TrueAccord Corp. and InCorp Services, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv01330 |
| December 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Barbara D Holmes |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: The Court expects both parties to act in good faith in their attempt to settle this case. Both parties should fairly and reasonably evaluate the case in an attempt to resolve it without further time or expense. Defendant's counsel shall initiate the settlement effort and shall file a settlement status report, after having discussed the status report with Plaintiff in advance, by no later than February 29, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 1/29/2024. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by TrueAccord Corp..(Hightower, Bradley) |
| Filing 9 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by TrueAccord Corp.. (Hightower, Bradley) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS returned executed by Samuel McKeen Elliott. TrueAccord Corp. served on 1/2/2024. (kc) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: The parties are advised that they will be required to make an early attempt to resolve the case through settlement, and, by a separate order entered at the appropriate time, the Court will enter a scheduling order that sets out the pre-trial deadlines for the progression of this case. As Plaintiff was already advised, he is responsible for serving process upon Defendant in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to timely complete service of process will result in dismissal of the action. So ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 12/21/2023. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Court. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 12/19/2023. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
| Filing 5 Summons issued as to TrueAccord Corp. Service copy returned at intake. (ad). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ad) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (ad) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (ad) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against InCorp Services, Inc., TrueAccord Corp. (Filing fee $405, Receipt number 300001687), filed by Samuel McKeen Elliott. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment - Receipt)(ad) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (ad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
