Keidrick v. Van Teil et al
Daniel Keidrick |
Warden Van Teil and Unknown Green Team Members |
3:2024cv00082 |
January 26, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Waverly D Crenshaw |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER: To proceed, Keidrick MUST, within 30 DAYS of the date this Order is entered on the docket, either pay the $405 filing fee in full or submit an in forma pauperis application. The Clerk of Court SHALL mail Keidrick a blank in forma pauperis application for prisoners (AO 240). Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 3/7/2024. (xc: Order and AO 240 form Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc) Modified on 3/7/2024 (kc). |
Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (af) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Produce Security Footage Video by Daniel Keidrick. (af) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Unknown Green Team Members, Van Teil, filed by Daniel Keidrick. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Incident Statement, #2 Attachment - Statement of Facts, #3 Attachment - Proposed Summons)(af) |
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (af) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.