Johnson v. Frankenberg
| Andre Lemaurio Johnson |
| David Frankenberg |
| 3:2024cv00089 |
| January 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Jeffery S Frensley |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER REFERRING CASE: Andre Lemaurio Johnson brings a pro se Complaint against David Frankenberg under federal banking laws and state law. (Doc. No. #1 ). Because Plaintiff paid the full filing fee, there is no further screening of the Complaint. Benson v. O'Brian, 179 F.3d 1014, 1017 (6th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, this action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to oversee service of process, enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 3/18/2024. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
| Filing 9 REPLY to Response to re #6 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by David Frankenberg. (Helou, William) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Andre Lemaurio Johnson. (mg) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support of #6 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by David Frankenberg . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit NES Rules and Regs, #2 Exhibit Power of Attorney)(Helou, William) |
| Filing 6 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by David Frankenberg. (Helou, William) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS returned executed by Andre Lemaurio Johnson. David Frankenberg served on 1/29/2024. (kc) |
| Filing 4 Summons issued as to David Frankenberg. Service pages returned to pro se plaintiff at intake window. (kc) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (kc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (unsigned) against David Frankenberg (Filing fee $405, Receipt number 300001978), filed by Andre Lemaurio Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits, #2 Attachment - Receipt, #3 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(kc) Modified on 1/29/2024 (kc). (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/2/2024: #4 Attachment - Signed Complaint) (kc). |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (kc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Frankenberg | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andre Lemaurio Johnson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: David Frankenberg | |
| Represented By: | William N. Helou |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
