Doe (DJB) v. Lee et al
Plaintiff: John Doe (DJB)
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Case Number: 3:2024cv00144
Filed: February 7, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: William L Campbell
Referring Judge: Alistair Newbern
Nature of Suit: Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER: The #16 Motion to Substitute Attorney is GRANTED. Attorney Elizabeth Helen Evan terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 03/22/24. (ad)
March 22, 2024 TN State Bar status verified as active for Mara Lynne Cunningham admitted to this court. (ad)
March 21, 2024 Filing 16 MOTION to Substitute Attorney by William B. Lee, David B. Rausch. (Cunningham, Mara)
March 7, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. #11 ) is GRANTED. The motion to administratively stay the case pending the Sixth Circuits decision in Does #1-9 v. Lee (Doc. No. #12 ) is also GRANTED. Plaintiff's request not to administratively close case until the parties negotiated a preliminary injunction (Doc. No. #4 ) is MOOT. This case is STAYED and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pending further order of the Court. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint and to Plaintiff's #2 Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym and for Protective Order within fourteen (14) days of the reopening of the case. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 03/07/24. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ad)
March 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER: The #13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint is GRANTED. William B. Lee answer due 3/22/2024; David B. Rausch answer due 3/22/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 03/04/24. (ad)
March 1, 2024 Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Complaint by William B. Lee, David B. Rausch. (Evan, Elizabeth) Modified on 3/4/2024 (ad).
February 23, 2024 Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Stay Administratively Pending Ruling in Sixth Circuit Appeal by William B. Lee, David B. Rausch. (Evan, Elizabeth)
February 23, 2024 Filing 11 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by John Doe (DJB). (Attachments: #1 Attachment proposed order)(Nisbet, John)
February 23, 2024 TN State Bar status verified as active for Elizabeth Helen Evan admitted to this court. (ad)
February 22, 2024 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Helen Evan on behalf of William B. Lee, David B. Rausch (Evan, Elizabeth)
February 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 02/08/24. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ad)
February 7, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 4/2/2024 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (af)
February 7, 2024 Filing 7 Summons issued as to William B. Lee, David B. Rausch. Service copies placed at front counter to be picked up by counsel. (af)
February 7, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (af)
February 7, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (af)
February 7, 2024 Filing 4 Request not to Administratively Close Case Until Parties Can Negotiate Preliminary Injunction by John Doe (DJB). (af)
February 7, 2024 Filing 3 MEMORANDUM in Support of #2 MOTION for Protective Order filed by John Doe (DJB). (af)
February 7, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Under Pseudonym and for Protective Order by John Doe (DJB). (af)
February 7, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against William B. Lee, David B. Rausch (Filing fee $405, Receipt number ATNMDC-4007272), filed by John Doe (DJB). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit redacted SOR entry for DJB, #2 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(af)
February 7, 2024 TN State Bar status verified as active for John B. Nisbet, III admitted to this court. (af)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe (DJB) v. Lee et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe (DJB)
Represented By: John B. Nisbet, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William B. Lee
Represented By: Elizabeth Helen Evan
Represented By: Mara Lynne Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David B. Rausch
Represented By: Elizabeth Helen Evan
Represented By: Mara Lynne Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?