Malone v. Phillips et al
Plaintiff: Lee Malone
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Case Number: 3:2024cv00177
Filed: February 15, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Waverly D Crenshaw
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ad)
February 21, 2024 Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (ad)
February 16, 2024 Filing 6 Case transferred in from the District of Tennessee Western; Case Number 2:23-cv-02793. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
February 13, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF TRANSFER. This case is TRANSFERRED to the Nashville Division of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. The CLERK is DIRECTED TO CLOSE this case without entry of judgment. Signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 2/13/2024. (Mays, Samuel) [Transferred from Tennessee Western on 2/16/2024.]
December 26, 2023 Filing 4 ATTACHMENT (first page of IFP motion) to #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lee Malone.. (Attachments: #1 cover letter, #2 envelope)(jae) [Transferred from Tennessee Western on 2/16/2024.]
December 19, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) [Transferred from Tennessee Western on 2/16/2024.]
December 19, 2023 Filing 2 Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lee Malone. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Prisoner Trust Fund Account, #2 Inmate Trust Fund Acount)(csf) [Transferred from Tennessee Western on 2/16/2024.]
December 19, 2023 Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights Under 42 U.S.C. 1983 - Complaint for Prospective Injunctive Relief against All Defendants, filed by Lee Malone. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Case assignment label, #12 Envelope (Left side Right side))(csf) [Transferred from Tennessee Western on 2/16/2024.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Malone v. Phillips et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lee Malone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe #1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?