Hollis v. Holloway et al
| Horace Hollis |
| James M. Holloway, Eugene Lewis, Cpl. f/n/u White and Cpl. f/n/u Murphy |
| 3:2024cv00178 |
| February 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Alistair Newbern |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Because Plaintiff demonstrates that he does not have sufficient funds to pay the full filing fee in advance, the amended application (Doc. No. #7 ) is GRANTED and a $350 filing fee is ASSESSED. The warden of the facility in which Plaintiff is currently housed, as custodian of his trust account, is DIRECTED to submit to the Clerk of Court, as an initial payment. The Clerk of Court SHALL send a copy of this Order to the warden of the facility in which Plaintiff is currently housed to ensure compliance with that portion of 28 U.S.C. 1915 pertaining to the payment of the filing fee. The Complaint states a nonfrivolous conditions of confinement claim against Defendants White and Murphy that will proceed for further development. Defendants Holloway and Lewis are DISMISSED. The Clerk is INSTRUCTED to send Plaintiff two service packets (blank summons and USM 285 form) for Defendants White and Murphy. Plaintiff MUST complete the service packet and return it to the Clerk's Office within 30 DAYS of the date of this Order. Upon return of the completed service packet, PROCESS SHALL ISSUE. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, to dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and to conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 4/11/2024. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail along with two service packets. Copy of order sent to the warden of the facility. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
|
|
Filing 7
APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Horace Hollis. (af)
|
|
Filing 6
Letter from Horace Hollis. (af)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Horace Hollis, an inmate at the Lois DeBerry Special Needs Facility, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (Doc. No. #1 ) and submitted an in forma pauperis application (Doc. No. #2 ). Here, Plaintiff has submitted an unsigned trust account statement. For the Court to consider the application, Plaintiff MUST submit the required certified trust account statement within 30 DAYS of the date this Order is entered on the docket. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 3/7/2024. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
|
Filing 4
Letter from Horace Hollis. (af)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc)
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Horace Hollis. (kc)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against James M. Holloway, Eugene Lewis, f/n/u Murphy, f/n/u White, filed by Horace Hollis.(kc)
|
|
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (kc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
