Fuqua v. Findlay and Sons, Inc. Tommy Car Wash 2 et al
| Peyton Brock Fuqua |
| Findlay and Sons, Inc. Tommy Car Wash 2, Findlay & Son's, Inc. doing business as Tommy Express Car Wash and Scott Findlay |
| 3:2024cv00228 |
| February 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Alistair Newbern |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: On April 24, 2024, Plaintiff Peyton Fuqua filed a motion to continue the initial case management conference set on April 30, 2024, because Defendants Findlay and Sons, Inc., Tommy Car Wash 2, Findlay & Sons, Inc, and Scott Findlay have not yet made an appearance in this matter. (Doc. No. #9 ). The motion is GRANTED. The initial case management conference is CONTINUED to May 30, 2024, at 9:30 a.m. Counsel for each party shall call (888) 557-8511 and enter access code 7819165# to participate. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 4/25/2024. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
|
| Reset Hearings: Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone reset for 5/30/2024 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (am) |
| NOTICE TO FILER re DE#9 : Pursuant to Local Rule 5.01, Certificates of Service shall identify by name the person served, what was served, the method of service, and date of service. Counsel did not sign the certificate of service or include all Counsel on the certificate of service. Please FILE a conformed Certificate of Service for this document. (am) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Continue Initial Case Management Conference by Peyton Brock Fuqua. (Bryant, J.) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS returned executed by Peyton Brock Fuqua. All Defendants. (Bryant, J.) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the District Court in accordance with the procedures of Local Rule 16.01. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 3/4/2024. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 4/30/2024 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (af) |
| Filing 5 Summons issued as to Scott Findlay, Findlay & Son's, Inc., Findlay and Sons, Inc. Tommy Car Wash 2. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (af) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (af) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (af) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (af) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Scott Findlay, Findlay & Son's, Inc., Findlay and Sons, Inc. Tommy Car Wash 2 (Filing fee $405, Receipt number ATNMDC-4023812), filed by Peyton Brock Fuqua. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Consent to Join, #2 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(af) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Gordon E. Jackson, J. Russ Bryant, John Joseph Leatherwood, IV admitted to this court. (af) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
