Dunnam v. Wilson County, Tennessee et al
Casey Dunnam |
Wilson County, Tennessee and Betsy Jakalski |
3:2024cv00231 |
February 29, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Waverly D Crenshaw |
Alistair Newbern |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 4/30/2024 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (af) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (af) |
Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (af) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Betsy Jakalski, Wilson County, Tennessee (Filing fee $405, Receipt number ATNMDC-4023959), filed by Casey Dunnam. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(af) |
NOTICE TO COUNSEL Jerry Gonzales: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall be admitted to practice. The application for admission is available on the website at #http://www.tnmd.uscourts.gov/forms/admission-practice-application (LR 83.01(a)). Admission due by 3/21/2024. (af) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Jerry Gonzales not admitted to this court. (af) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Jesse Ford Harbison admitted to this court. (af) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.