Dirickson v. Liberty Mutual Insurance et al
Richard Landon Dirickson |
Liberty Mutual Insurance, Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc., Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Group, Liberty Mutual Insurance Group and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company |
3:2024cv00234 |
March 1, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Alistair Newbern |
Eli J Richardson |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed by Richard Landon Dirickson. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company served on 4/23/2024; Liberty Mutual Group served on 4/23/2024; Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc. served on 4/23/2024; Liberty Mutual Insurance served on 4/23/2024; Liberty Mutual Insurance Company served on 4/23/2024; Liberty Mutual Insurance Group served on 4/23/2024; Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company served on 4/23/2024. (ad) |
Filing 8 ALIAS SUMMONS ISSUED as to Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Group, Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Group, Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company. (ad) |
Filing 7 Summons rejected by Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance stating service not perfected. Documents returned to plaintiff by regular mail. (kc) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS returned executed by Richard Landon Dirickson. Liberty Mutual Group served on 3/7/2024; Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc. served on 3/7/2024; Liberty Mutual Insurance served on 3/7/2024; Liberty Mutual Insurance Company served on 3/7/2024; Liberty Mutual Insurance Group served on 3/7/2024; Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company served on 3/7/2024. (ad) |
Filing 5 Summons issued as to Liberty Mutual Group, Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Group, Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company. (Summons to be served on registered agent and principal business address.) (ad) |
Filing 4 ORDER: This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedureand the Local Rules of Court. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 03/07/24. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ad) |
Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ad) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (ad) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Group, Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Group, Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company (Filing fee $405, Receipt number 300002281), filed by Richard Landon Dirickson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A The "Policy", #2 Attachment - Receipt)(ad) |
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (ad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.