Doe v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Case Number: 3:2024cv00254
Filed: March 5, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: William L Campbell
Referring Judge: Jeffery S Frensley
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2024 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to to Litigate This Case Pseudonymously and Brief in Support Thereof by John Doe. (Potter, Thomas)
March 5, 2024 Filing 8 MOTION for attorney Russell Gerard Ryan to Appear Pro Hac Vice (paid $150 PHV fee; receipt number ATNMDC-4027470) by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Certificate of Good Standing)(Potter, Thomas)
March 5, 2024 Filing 7 MOTION for attorney Katherine Brady Norman to Appear Pro Hac Vice (paid $150 PHV fee; receipt number ATNMDC-4027467) by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Certificate of Good Standing)(Potter, Thomas)
March 5, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 5/28/2024 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. (mg)
March 5, 2024 Filing 5 Summons issued as to Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Service copies will be picked up by counsel. (mg)
March 5, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg)
March 5, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (mg)
March 5, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (mg)
March 5, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF against Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (Filing fee $405, Receipt number ATNMDC-4027102), filed by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(mg)
March 5, 2024 TN State Bar status verified as active for Thomas K. Potter, III admitted to this court. (mg)
March 5, 2024 TN State Bar status verified as active for Kaitlyn Schiraldi not admitted to this court. (mg)
March 5, 2024 D.C. Bar status verified as active for Russell G. Ryan not admitted to this court - Local counsel secured. (mg)
March 5, 2024 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Russell G. Ryan, Casey Norman, Kaitlyn Schiraldi: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, a Certificate of Good Standing signed by the Clerk of a United States District Court or a U. S. appellate court where admitted, and pay a fee of $150.00 (LR 83.01(b)). PHV due by 3/26/2024. (mg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe
Represented By: Casey Norman
Represented By: Kaitlyn Schiraldi
Represented By: Russell G. Ryan
Represented By: Thomas K. Potter, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?