John Doe (KWS) v. Lee et al
| John Doe (KWS) |
| William B. Lee and David B. Rausch |
| 3:2024cv00378 |
| April 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Barbara D Holmes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone is set for 7/22/2024 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (kc) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (kc) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST Not to Administratively Close Case by John Doe (KWS). (kc) |
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM in Support of #2 MOTION for Protective Order filed by John Doe (KWS). (kc) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Protective Order by John Doe (KWS). (kc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against William B. Lee, David B. Rausch (Filing fee $405, Receipt number ATNMDC-4048144), filed by John Doe (KWS). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Redacted SOR entry for KWS, #2 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(kc) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for John B. Nisbet, III admitted to this court. (kc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
