Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC v. Greenberg et al
| Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC |
| Daniel S. Greenberg, Carla D. Gifford, The Estate of Marian Wise and State of Tennessee, The |
| 3:2024cv00591 |
| May 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Real Property |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ad) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (ad). |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (ad) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Electronic Filing Privileges by Daniel S. Greenberg. (ad) Modified on 5/13/2024 (ad). |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Daniel S. Greenberg. (ad) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Daniel S. Greenberg from Chancery Court for Davidson County, case number 23-0224-I. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A & K, #2 Exhibit E- state court documents, #3 Exhibit I -state court documents, #4 Exhibit L-state court documents, #5 Exhibit M-state court documents, #6 Exhibit N-state court documents)(ad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
