Wilson v. Wright et al
| Jerry Scott Wilson |
| Rutherford County, Tennessee, Travis Lampley, Scott Martin, Jonathan T. Skrmetti, Riley Dunmeyer and Matthew Wright |
| 3:2024cv01005 |
| August 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Barbara D Holmes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 11/25/2024 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (am) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (am) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (am) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Wesley B. Clark, Kyle F. Mothershead admitted to this court. (am) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Riley Dunmeyer, Travis Lampley, Scott Martin, Rutherford County, Tennessee, Jonathan T. Skrmetti, Matthew Wright (Filing fee $405, Receipt number ATNMDC-4143709), filed by Jerry Scott Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Dr. Wilson's Original Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Order for voluntary dx without prejudice, #3 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(am) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
