Whyte v. Atwood et al
| Darrell Ricardo Whyte |
| Adam T. Dodd, Unknown Sheriff Deputy, Greg Bankston, Jo B. Atwood, Tillman W. Payne and John H. Bratcher |
| 3:2024cv01458 |
| December 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ad) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (ad) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (ad) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Thumb drive by Darrell Ricardo Whyte (ad) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jo B. Atwood, Greg Bankston, John H. Bratcher, Adam T. Dodd, Tillman W. Payne, Unknown Sheriff Deputy (Filing fee $405, Receipt number 300004567), filed by Darrell Ricardo Whyte. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Contents List, #2 Exhibit Various Documents to Complaint, #3 Attachment - Receipt)(ad) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (ad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
