Probert et al v. Clorox Company, The
Plaintiff: Dave D. Probert and Jacklyn O. Probert
Defendant: Clorox Company, The
Case Number: 1:2007cv00139
Filed: October 15, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Northern Office
County: Davis
Presiding Judge: Dee Benson
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 0145 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 100 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 57 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 8/7/2009. (rlr)
July 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 97 MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 47 Motion for Summary Judgment ; denying 60 Motion under Rule 56(f) to Continue the Due Date of its Opposition Paper re 47 Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of Claims 1, 3, and 4 of the Patent -in-Suit as Anticipated and/or Obvious ; denying 83 Motion under Rule 56(f) to Further Continue the Due Date of its Opposition Papers re 80 Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the Patent-in-Suit Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 112, 47 Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of Claims 1, 3, and 4 of the Patent-in-Suit as Anticipated and/or Obvious. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 7/17/2009. (rlr)
April 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 85 MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 14 Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer and Counterclaim. Within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, Defendant shall file and amended answer and counterclaim; denying 15 Motion to Compel Deposition of Mr. Zeng er; granting 25 Motion for Protective Order; denying 29 Motion to Compel License Information from Defendant. Defendant's motion for rule 11 sanctions is no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Warner. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 4/15/2009. (rlr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Probert et al v. Clorox Company, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dave D. Probert
Represented By: Todd E Zenger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacklyn O. Probert
Represented By: Todd E Zenger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clorox Company, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?