Calloway v. Aerojet General
Patricia Calloway |
Aerojet General |
1:2008cv00162 |
December 30, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
Weber |
Dale A. Kimball |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDERgranting 8 Motion for Summary Judgment. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Aerojet General Corporation and against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 06/11/2010. (kpf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Calloway v. Aerojet General | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Patricia Calloway | |
Represented By: | Philip C. Patterson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Aerojet General | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.