Calloway v. Aerojet General
Plaintiff: Patricia Calloway
Defendant: Aerojet General
Case Number: 1:2008cv00162
Filed: December 30, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Weber
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Kimball
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDERgranting 8 Motion for Summary Judgment. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Aerojet General Corporation and against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 06/11/2010. (kpf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Calloway v. Aerojet General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Calloway
Represented By: Philip C. Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aerojet General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?