S. v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey
Plaintiff: Eugene S.
Defendant: Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey
Case Number: 1:2009cv00101
Filed: July 27, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Northern Office
County: Davis
Presiding Judge: David Sam
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER-denying 24 Motion to Strike Declaration of Mary Anne Q. Wood and the Exhibits Attached Thereto. Signed by Judge David Sam on 12/22/10. (jmr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: S. v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eugene S.
Represented By: Brian S King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?