Waters v. Stearns Lending
Plaintiff: Michael Waters
Defendant: Stearns Lending
Case Number: 1:2010cv00196
Filed: November 24, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Northern Office
County: Weber
Presiding Judge: Clark Waddoups
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 13 Report and Recommendations, 5 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Stearns Lending, 3 Motion to Dismiss filed by Stearns Lending. This case is therefore DISMISSED. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs. Case Closed. Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 5/10/2011. (jtj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Waters v. Stearns Lending
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Waters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stearns Lending
Represented By: Michael J. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?