Ball et al v. Division of Child and Family Services et al
| James Ball and Sarah Ball |
| Joseph Leiker, Deann Taylor, Mark Robertson, Division of Child and Family Services, Maribeth Mayfield, Heather Baker, Rosie Holmes and Danny Thomas |
| 1:2011cv00028 |
| February 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Northern Office |
| Davis |
| Clark Waddoups |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM DECISION-The Court hereby vacates the previous Decision 60 and enters this decision dismissing Plaintiffs claimswithout prejudice based on the lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Hollander v. Sandoz Pharm. Corp., 289 F.3d 1193, 1216 (10th Cir. 2002). Signed by Judge David Sam on 10/17/13. (jmr)
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 46 Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly, Plaintiffs claims against the Carper Defendants are dismissed because the Carper Defendants were notacting under color of state law. Alternatively, even if the CarperDefendants were state actors, the Court Plaintiffs claims would failbased on the doctrine of qualified immunity. See order for further details. Signed by Judge David Sam on 6/14/12. (jmr)
|
|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 40 Motion to Dismiss and plaintiffs' claims against these defendants are dismissed with prejudice. So Ordered. Signed by Judge David Sam on 4/19/12. (jmr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
