Mayall v. Randall Firm, The et al
Plaintiff: Justin Mayall
Defendant: Randall Firm, The, Neal S. Randall and Meade Recovery Services
Case Number: 1:2013cv00166
Filed: December 3, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Northern Office
County: Cache
Presiding Judge: Evelyn J. Furse
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 192 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 185 Motion to Set Aside Attorney's Lien; denying as moot 191 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Relief should instead be sought in the state court. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 1/23/20 (alt)
September 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 177 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 153 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 153 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 156 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting in part and deny ing in part 156 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 167 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 167 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The court will not dismiss plaintiff's Section 1692e claim or civil conspiracy claim, but will dismiss the other claims against the moving parties. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 9/26/19 (alt)
August 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 125 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying as moot 121 Motion to Strike; denying as moot 123 Motion to Amend Answer. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 8/10/17 (alt)
August 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 124 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 102 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings: All claims against Mountain Division CVH (a Tennessee limited liability company), CVSH (a Utah limited liability company) and David Geary (an individual ) are dismissed. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 8/9/17 (alt)
September 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 92 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 50 Motion to Dismiss Parties Dr. Vikas Garg and Advanced Spine Pain Specialists: two of the four claims against these parties are dismissed. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 9/28/16 (alt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mayall v. Randall Firm, The et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Justin Mayall
Represented By: William Ogburn Huggins, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Randall Firm, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Neal S. Randall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Meade Recovery Services
Represented By: Micah Lawton Daines
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?