Rucker v. Swensen et al
Plaintiff: Gary Washington Rucker
Defendant: Chase Swensen, Kai Safsten and Ogden City Police Department
Case Number: 1:2015cv00054
Filed: April 6, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Northern Office
County: Weber
Presiding Judge: Dee Benson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The court orders as follows:1. The 85 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED IN FULL.2. Defendants' 80 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.3. The case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 03/31/2022. (jl)
July 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 76 MEMORANDUM DECISION and Ordergranting in part and denying in part 70 Motion for Sanctions. The defendants' motion is GRANTED to the extent is seeks a sanction, but is DENIED to the extent it seeks dismissal. As described more fully above, the court ORDERS:1. The defendants' motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;2. The scheduling order is amended as set forth above;3. The defendants may depose Mr. Rucker within thirty days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 07/29/2021. (jl)
June 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; denying 60 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution ; adopting in full Report and Recommendations re 68 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 6/4/21. (alf)
March 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 69 MEMORANDUM DECISION as to Motion 60 . Motions for amended scheduling order and to compel are GRANTED - Mr. Rucker must respond to Defendants outstanding discovery requests by March 24, 2021. Motion for attorney's fees is DENIED. The court addresses Defendants alternative relief sought, a motion to dismiss, in a separate Report and Recommendation. See order for updated deadlines to Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 3/3/21. (alf)
January 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 8 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 1/21/16. (jlw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rucker v. Swensen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary Washington Rucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chase Swensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kai Safsten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ogden City Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?