Delgado v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Michael Delgado
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 1:2015cv00138
Filed: October 27, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Northern Office
County: Weber
Presiding Judge: Paul M. Warner
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to 46 Report and Recommendations, 3 Complaint, filed by Michael Delgado. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and the Commissioner's decision in AFFIRMED. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 7/25/17. (jmr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Delgado v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Delgado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?