Shelton v. Chipotle Mexican Grill
Plaintiff: Tammy Shelton
Defendant: Chipotle Mexican Grill
Case Number: 1:2017cv00103
Filed: June 13, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Northern Office
County: Davis
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Kimball
Presiding Judge: Paul M. Warner
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting without prejudice Defendant's 13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The court grants Plaintiff 20 days from the date of this Order to submit an Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 1/17/2018. (eat)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shelton v. Chipotle Mexican Grill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tammy Shelton
Represented By: Jonathan L. Felt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chipotle Mexican Grill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?