TVPX ARS v. Bombardier
Plaintiff: TVPX ARS
Defendant: Bombardier
Case Number: 1:2017cv00107
Filed: June 26, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Northern Office
County: Davis
Presiding Judge: Evelyn J. Furse
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 77 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: Bombardier's 38 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and TVPX's 34 Partial Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. As a result of the court's granting of summary judgment in favor of Bombardier, TVPX's 33 Motion in Limine is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 9/30/19. (dla)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TVPX ARS v. Bombardier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TVPX ARS
Represented By: Daniel E. Barnett
Represented By: Stephen E.W. Hale
Represented By: Austin J. Riter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bombardier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?