Plott et al v. Advanced Comfort Technologies et al
Shamina Plott and Jacob Plott |
Advanced Comfort Technologies and Colin M. House |
1:2018cv00048 |
May 7, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Northern Office |
Morgan |
Tena Campbell |
Other Personal Injury |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 79 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 61 Motion for Protective Order; granting 77 Motion to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order; finding as moot 65 Motion to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order; finding as moot 67 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 76 Motion to Take Deposition ; finding as moot 76 Motion to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 4/13/20 (alt) |
Filing 60 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 41 Motion to Quash Subpoena; granting 41 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 1/23/20 (alt) |
Filing 52 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 44 Ms. Plott's Motion to Consolidate Cases and denying as moot 34 Motion to Amend. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 12/30/2019. (jds) |
Filing 28 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION granting in part and denying in part 17 Motion to Dismiss: Shamina Plott's state law claims against ACTIare dismissed. Jacob Plott's state law claims against ACTI and Mr. House are dismissed and Mr. Plott is hereby dismissed as a party from this case. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 4/2/19 (alt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.