Rios v. Davis County Jail
Christopher Enrique Rios |
Davis County Jail |
Prisoner Litigation Unit |
1:2019cv00114 |
October 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Tena Campbell |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 **SEALED DOCUMENT**Inmate Inquiry Statement filed by Plaintiff Christopher Enrique Rios. (kpf) |
Filing 5 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Letter to the Magistrate Judge regarding case. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (kpf) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Davis County Jail (Originally received by the court on 10/04/2019). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Christopher Enrique Rios. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope ) Assigned to Judge Tena Campbell (tlh) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Initial Partial fee: Waived. Collection of Fees Sent: Yes Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 10/09/2019. (tlh) |
Filing 2 *** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement for Christopher Enrique Rios received from Correctional Institution. (nl) |
Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse for review, case file forwarded to PLU. (Received by the court on: 10/04/2019) filed by Plaintiff Christopher Enrique Rios. (nl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.