Young Resources Limited Partnership et al v. Pisgah Grazing et al
| Charles Young, Young Resources Limited Partnership and John Young |
| Leo R. Beus, Annette Beus, Pisgah Grazing and Michael K. Schugg |
| 1:2019cv00130 |
| November 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Dee Benson |
| Evelyn J Furse |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re #14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Memorandum in Support and to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendant Pisgah Grazing. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits 1-18)(Hale, Ashley) |
| Filing 23 REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION for ADR - Arbitration and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs Charles Young, John Young, Young Resources Limited Partnership. (Harrington, Robert) |
| Filing 22 RESPONSE to Motion re #14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Memorandum in Support and to Compel Arbitration filed by Plaintiffs Charles Young, John Young, Young Resources Limited Partnership. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -- Agreement Regarding Water Rights, #2 Exhibit B -- Partition Agreement)(Lewis, Matthew) |
| Filing 21 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION for ADR - Arbitration and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Annette Beus, Leo R. Beus, Pisgah Grazing, Michael K. Schugg. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15)(Beus, Megan) |
Filing 20
ORDER granting #19 Joint Stipulated Motion to Extend Deadlinesfor Briefing and Discovery. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 11/27/2019. (jds)
|
| Filing 19 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time for Briefing and Discovery filed by Plaintiffs Charles Young, John Young, Young Resources Limited Partnership. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Harrington, Robert) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Megan E. Beus for Annette Beus,Megan E. Beus for Leo R. Beus,Megan E. Beus for Pisgah Grazing,Megan E. Beus for Michael K. Schugg. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 11/22/2019. (jds)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Leo R. Beus for Annette Beus,Leo R. Beus for Leo R. Beus,Leo R. Beus for Pisgah Grazing,Leo R. Beus for Michael K. Schugg. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 11/22/2019. (jds)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Ashley Williams Hale for Annette Beus,Ashley Williams Hale for Leo R. Beus,Ashley Williams Hale for Pisgah Grazing,Ashley Williams Hale for Michael K. Schugg. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 11/22/2019. (jds)
|
| Filing 15 EXHIBITS filed by Annette Beus, Leo R. Beus, Pisgah Grazing, Michael K. Schugg re #14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Memorandum in Support and to Compel Arbitration. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 7 - Email from Draney, #2 Exhibit 8 - Email to Tolman, #3 Exhibit 9 - Letter to Brett Tolman, #4 Exhibit 10 - Email attach billing, #5 Exhibit 11 - LT Brett Tolman, #6 Exhibit 12 - POS of Petition of Arbitration, #7 Exhibit 13 - LT Brett Tolman, #8 Exhibit 14 - Letter to Tolman, #9 Exhibit 15 - Email from Tolman to cc, #10 Exhibit 16 - Email, #11 Exhibit 17 - LT Beus from Harrington, #12 Exhibit 18 - LT Robert Harrington, #13 Exhibit 19 - LT Robert Harrington, #14 Exhibit 20 - LT Draney, #15 Exhibit 21 - Re Deposition of John Young, #16 Exhibit 22 - Notice of Dismissal, #17 Exhibit 23 - First Amendment to Partition Agreement, #18 Exhibit 24 - LT Draney from L Beus)(Anderson, Gary) |
| Filing 14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Memorandum in Support and to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendants Annette Beus, Leo R. Beus, Pisgah Grazing, Michael K. Schugg. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Partition Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2 - AAA Rules, #3 Exhibit 3 - Demand for Arbitration, #4 Exhibit 4 - LT and Demand, #5 Exhibit 5 - LT Draney from L. Beus, #6 Exhibit 6 - Water Rights Agreement)(Anderson, Gary) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Megan E. Beus , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number 1088-3424857, filed by Defendants Annette Beus, Leo R. Beus, Pisgah Grazing, Michael K. Schugg. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Electronic Case Filing Registration Form, #3 Text of Proposed Order Order for Pro Hac Vice Admission)(Anderson, Gary) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Leo R. Beus , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number 1088-3424404, filed by Defendants Annette Beus, Leo R. Beus, Pisgah Grazing, Michael K. Schugg. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Text of Proposed Order Order for Pro Hac Vice Admission)(Anderson, Gary) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Ashley Williams Hale , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number 1088-3424400, filed by Defendants Annette Beus, Leo R. Beus, Pisgah Grazing, Michael K. Schugg. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Electronic Case Filing Registration Form, #3 Text of Proposed Order Order for Pro Hac Vice Admission)(Anderson, Gary) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF FILING of Defendants' Identification of Limited Liability Company Members and Individual's State of Domicile filed by Defendants Annette Beus, Leo R. Beus, Pisgah Grazing, Michael K. Schugg. (Anderson, Gary) |
| Filing 9 Case randomly assigned to Judge Dee Benson per docket text order 8 . Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse no longer assigned to the case. (nl) |
|
Filing 8
DOCKET TEXT ORDER FOR CASE TO BE REASSIGNED: Given the procedural posture of this case, including the deficient #2 Notice of Removal that does not establish the court's subject matter jurisdiction and pending #7 Motion to Determine Scope of Arbitration Provision and to Compel Compliance with Procedures for Selection of Arbitrator, reassignment of this case to a district judge is warranted at this time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be reassigned to a district judge through random reassignment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 11/15/2019. (nas)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Determine Scope of Arbitration Provision and To Compel Compliance With Procedures For Selection of Arbitrator, filed by Plaintiffs Charles Young, John Young, and Young Resources Limited Partnership. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Partition Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2-Agreement re Water Rights, #3 Exhibit 3-Demand for Arbitration, #4 Affidavit Declaration of Shawn E. Draney in Support of Motion)(nl) |
| Filing 6 File Received from 1st District, Box Elder County consisting of Docket and filings from state court. (Attachments: #1 State Complaint, #2 Motion to Determine Scope of Arbitration, #3 Exhibit 1-Motion to Determine Scope of Arbitration, #4 Exhibit 2-Motion to Determine Scope of Arbitration, #5 Exhibit 3-Motion to Determine Scope of Arbitration, #6 Affidavit Declaration of Shawn E. Draney in Support of Motion to Determine Scope of Arbitration, #7 State Notice of Removal) (nl) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within fourteen(14) days. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 11/14/2019. (nl)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 15 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendants Annette Beus, Leo R. Beus, Pisgah Grazing, Michael K. Schugg, Plaintiffs Charles Young, John Young, Young Resources Limited Partnership. Form due by 11/29/2019. (nl) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Defendants Annette Beus, Leo R. Beus, Pisgah Grazing, Michael K. Schugg, Plaintiffs Charles Young, John Young, Young Resources Limited Partnership. (nl) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from First District Court, Box Elder County, State of Utah, case number 190100186, (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3419090) filed by Michael K. Schugg, Pisgah Grazing, Annette Beus, Leo R. Beus. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Pleadings filed in State Court Action) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse (Anderson, Gary) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse. Defendants Annette Beus, Leo R. Beus, Pisgah Grazing, Michael K. Schugg is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (nl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
