Prime Alliance Bank v. Leasing Innovations Incorporated
Prime Alliance Bank |
Leasing Innovations Incorporated |
1:2019cv00142 |
December 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
David B Barlow |
Dustin B Pead |
Cecilia M Romero |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 REASSIGNMENT to Newly Appointed District Judge. Case Reassigned to District Judge David B. Barlow. Judge Dee Benson no longer assigned to the case. Orders of the prior judge are affirmed including the order of reference to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28:636 (b)(1)(A) re 17 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge. Case number will now read 1:19cv00142-DBB-CMR. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (rks) |
Filing 20 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 1/30/2020. (jds) |
Filing 19 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #6 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support to Dismiss Under Fed R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) or Transfer Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a) Pursuant to Forum Selection Clause and Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b)(6) filed by Defendant Leasing Innovations Incorporated. (Scott, Justin) |
Filing 18 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support to Dismiss Under Fed R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) or Transfer Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a) Pursuant to Forum Selection Clause and Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b)(6) filed by Defendant Leasing Innovations Incorporated. (Scott, Justin) |
Filing 17 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 1/28/2020. (reb) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting #14 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Kenneth E. Rubinstein for Leasing Innovations Incorporated. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 1/21/2020. (jds) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting #13 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Nathan R. Fennessy for Leasing Innovations Incorporated. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 1/21/2020. (jds) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Kenneth E. Rubinstein , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number 1088-3464745, filed by Defendant Leasing Innovations Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit B-Electronic Case Filing Registration Form, #3 Text of Proposed Order Order for Pro Hac Vice Admission)(Scott, Justin) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Nathan R. Fennessy , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number 1088-3464725, filed by Defendant Leasing Innovations Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit B-Electronic Case Filing Registration Form, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Scott, Justin) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #6 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support to Dismiss Under Fed R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) or Transfer Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a) Pursuant to Forum Selection Clause and Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b)(6) filed by Plaintiff Prime Alliance Bank. (Williams, Jeffery) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #6 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 1/15/2020. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 1/6/2020. (jds) |
Filing 10 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support to Dismiss Under Fed R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) or Transfer Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a) Pursuant to Forum Selection Clause and Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b)(6) filed by Plaintiff Prime Alliance Bank. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Extension of Time)(Williams, Jeffery) |
Filing 9 All Consent/Reassignment Forms have now been received. After review of all forms, Case Reassigned to District Judge per request of one or more party(s). Case randomly assigned to Judge Dee Benson. Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead no longer assigned to the case. (nl) |
Filing 8 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendant Leasing Innovations Incorporated. (nl) |
Filing 7 NOTICE REMINDER - All parties are requested to respond within the time frame set forth in the #4 Notice of Presiding Magistrate Assignment,, pursuant to General Order 07-001. If you have already consented/objected, please disregard this notice. No judge will be informed of a party's response unless all parties have consented to the assignment of the matter to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Unless consents from all parties are received within fifteen(15) days, the case will be randomly re-assigned to a U.S. District Judge without further notice.# Link to Magistrate Consent Objection form (nl) |
Filing 6 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support to Dismiss Under Fed R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) or Transfer Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a) Pursuant to Forum Selection Clause and Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b)(6) filed by Defendant Leasing Innovations Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Limited Recourse Assignment, #2 Exhibit B-Servicing Agreement, #3 Exhibit C- Leasing Innovations letter to Prime Alliance Bank dated 4-12-18, #4 Exhibit D-Certificate of Delivery and Acceptance from QFF, #5 Exhibit E-Complaint dated 9-25-19, #6 Exhibit F-Notice of Termination Letter dated 11-12-19)(Scott, Justin) |
Filing 5 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Prime Alliance Bank. (las) |
Filing 4 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 15 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendant Leasing Innovations Incorporated, Plaintiff Prime Alliance Bank. Form due by 12/20/2019. (tlh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Defendant Leasing Innovations Incorporated and Plaintiff Prime Alliance Bank. (tlh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Second District Court Davis County, case number 190700696, (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3433861) filed by Leasing Innovations Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Complaint, #2 Exhibit B-Amended Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead (Scott, Justin) |
Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead. Defendant Leasing Innovations Incorporated is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (tlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.